Twitter como objeto de investigación en comunicación de la ciencia



Palabras clave:

Twitter, comunicación de la ciencia, periodismo científico, divulgación, redes sociales, análisis de redes


El servicio de microblogging Twitter, utilizado a la vez como red de información y como red social, es un objeto de investigación emergente con gran potencial para explorar la difusión de la ciencia, pero sobre el que existe cierto desorden teórico. Es por ello que en este artículo se documentan, en primer lugar, una serie de resultados relevantes en estudios de comunicación que se centran en el ecosistema Twitter. En segundo lugar, se sitúa el foco en el ámbito de la comunicación de la ciencia, para el que se exponen trabajos ilustrativos con el fin proporcionar una perspectiva de conjunto sobre los distintos propósitos, enfoques y metodologías utilizadas, en vistas a servir de marco conceptual para trabajos futuros. Además, como resultado de esta compilación, se esclarecen las principales funciones que desempeña Twitter como herramienta de comunicación científica, que dependiendo de los actores involucrados y sus objetivos aparentes se configuran de manera específica e incluso empíricamente observable. Se plantea asimismo una distinción entre dos aproximaciones de investigación; una centrada en la información —los temas científicos de interés público— y otra en los agentes difusores —científicos, periodistas e instituciones—. Por último, se sugieren algunas direcciones de investigación específicas para ulteriores estudios.




Aiello, L. M.; Petkos, G.; Martin, C.; Corney, D.; Papadopoulos, S.; Skraba, R.; Göker, A.; Kompatsiaris, I. & Jaimes, A. (2013). Sensing Trending Topics in Twitter. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 15(6), 1268-1282.

Alperin, J. P.; Gomez, C. J. & Haustein, S. (2019). Identifying diffusion patterns of research articles on Twitter: A case study of online engagement with open access articles. Public Understanding of Science, 28(1), 2-18.

Álvarez-Bornstein, B. & Montesi, M. (2019). Who is interacting with researchers on Twitter? A survey in the field of Information Science, 10(2), 87-106.

Becker, B. F. H.; Larson, H. J.; Bonhoeffer, J.; van Mulligen, E. M.; Kors, J. A. & Sturkenboom, M. C. J. M. (2016). Evaluation of a multinational, multilingual vaccine debate on Twitter. Vaccine, 34(50), 6166-6171.

Berger, J. & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of marketing research, 49(2), 192-205.

Bhattacharya, S.; Srinivasan, P. & Polgreen, P. (2014). Engagement with Health Agencies on Twitter. PLoS One, 9(11), e112235.

Boyd, D. (16/08/2009). Twitter: ‘Pointless Babble’ or Peripheral Awareness+ Social Grooming. Aphogenia.

Boyd, D.; Golder, S. & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Honolulu, HI.

Bradley, M. M. & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report C-1. The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.

Brossard, D. & Scheufele, D. A. (2013). Science, New Media, and the Public. Science, 339(6115), 40-41.

Brown, P. (2014). An explosion of alternatives. EMBO reports, 15(8), 827-832.

Castillo, C.; Mendoza, M. & Poblete, B. (2011). Information credibility on twitter. In WWW '11: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web (pp. 675–684).

Cha, M.; Haddadi, H.; Benevenuto, F. & Gummadi, K. P. (2010). Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. In Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 10-17).

Chew, C. & Eysenbach, G. (2010). Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak. PLoS One, 5(11), e14118.

Congosto, M. L. (2016). Caracterización de usuarios y propagación de mensajes en Twitter en el entorno de temas sociales. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid: España.

Côté, I. M. & Darling, E. S. (2018). Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the choir or singing from the rooftops? FACETS, 3(1), 682-694.

Dann, S. (2010). Twitter content classification. First Monday, 15(12).

Darling, E. S.; Shiffman, D.; Côté, I. M. & Drew, J. A. (2013). The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution, 6(1).

De Choudhury, M.; Lin, Y.-R.; Sundaram, H.; Candan, K. S.; Xie, L. & Kelliher, A. (2010). How does the data sampling strategy impact the discovery of information diffusion in social media? In Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 34-41).

Dehkharghani, R.; Mercan, H.; Javeed, A. & Saygin, Y. (2014). Sentimental causal rule discovery from Twitter. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(10), 4950-4958.

Díaz-Faes, A. A.; Bowman, T. D. & Costas, R. (2019). Towards a second generation of ‘social media metrics’: Characterizing Twitter communities of attention around science. PLoS One, 14(5), e0216408.

Dodds, P. S.; Harris, K. D.; Kloumann, I. M.; Bliss, C. A. & Danforth, C. M. (2011). Temporal Patterns of Happiness and Information in a Global Social Network: Hedonometrics and Twitter. PLoS One, 6(12), e26752.

Gerhards, J. & Schäfer, M. S. (2010). Is the internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany. New Media & Society, 12(1), 143-160.

Grabowicz, P. A.; Ramasco, J. J.; Moro, E.; Pujol, J. M. & Eguiluz, V. M. (2012). Social Features of Online Networks: The Strength of Intermediary Ties in Online Social Media. PLoS One, 7(1), e29358.

Hall, N. (2014). The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists. Genome Biology, 15(7), 424.

Harvey, K. (2014). Klout Score. In K. Harvey (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Media and Politics (pp. 753-754). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Haunschild, R.; Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Hellsten, I. & Marx, W. (2019). Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags. Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 695-707.

Haustein, S. (2019). Scholarly Twitter Metrics. In W. Glänzel; H. F. Moed; U. Schmoch & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 729-760). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Haustein, S.; Bowman, T. D. & Costas, R. (2016). Interpreting ‘Altmetrics’: Viewing Acts on Social Media through the Lens of Citation and Social Theories. In C. Sugimoto (Ed.), Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication (pp. 372-406). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.

Haustein, S.; Costas, R. & Larivière, V. (2015). Correction: Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns. PLoS One, 10(5), e0127830.

Hellsten, I. & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Automated analysis of actor–topic networks on twitter: New approaches to the analysis of socio-semantic networks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(1), 3-15.

Höijer, B. (2010). Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 19(6), 717-731.

Holton, A. E.; Baek, K.; Coddington, M. & Yaschur, C. (2014). Seeking and Sharing: Motivations for Linking on Twitter. Communication Research Reports, 31(1), 33-40.

Huberman, B. A.; Romero, D. M. & Wu, F. (2008). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, 14(1).

Hughes, A. L. & Palen, L. (2009). Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. International journal of emergency management, 6(3/4), 248-260.

Jahng, M. R. & Lee, N. (2018). When Scientists Tweet for Social Changes: Dialogic Communication and Collective Mobilization Strategies by Flint Water Study Scientists on Twitter. Science Communication, 40(1), 89-108.

Java, A.; Song, X.; Finin, T. & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07: Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis (pp. 56–65).

Kahle, K.; Sharon, A. J. & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2016). Footprints of Fascination: Digital Traces of Public Engagement with Particle Physics on CERN's Social Media Platforms. PLoS One, 11(5), e0156409.

Ke, Q.; Ahn, Y.-Y. & Sugimoto, C. R. (2017). A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter. PLoS One, 12(4), e0175368.

Kolari, P.; Finin, T.; Yesha, Y.; Yesha, Y.; Lyons, K.; Perelgut, S. & Hawkins, J. (2007). On the structure, properties and utility of internal corporate blogs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2007).

König, L. & Jucks, R. (2019). Hot topics in science communication: Aggressive language decreases trustworthiness and credibility in scientific debates. Public Understanding of Science, 28(4), 401-416.

Kwak, H.; Lee, C.; Park, H. & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In WWW '10: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (pp. 591–600).

Li, N.; Akin, H.; Su, L. Y.-F.; Brossard, D.; Xenos, M. & Scheufele, D. A. (2016). Tweeting disaster: An analysis of online discourse about nuclear power in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident. Journal of Science Communication, 15(5).

Liang, X.: Su, L. Y.-F.; Yeo, S. K.; Scheufele, D. A.; Brossard, D.; Xenos, M.; Nealey, P. & Corley, E. A. (2014). Building Buzz: (Scientists) Communicating Science in New Media Environments. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(4), 772-791.

Lin, Y.-R.; Keegan, B.; Margolin, D. & Lazer, D. (2014). Rising Tides or Rising Stars?: Dynamics of Shared Attention on Twitter during Media Events. PLoS One, 9(5), e94093.

López Pérez, L. y Olvera Lobo, M. D. (2019). Participación digital del público en la ciencia de excelencia española: análisis de los proyectos financiados por el European Research Council. El profesional de la información, 28(1).

Mandavilli, A. (2011). Peer review: Trial by Twitter. Nature, 469(7330), 286-287.

Murphy, J.; Hill, C. A. & Dean, E. (2013). Social Media, Sociality, and Survey Research. In E. D. C.A. Hill & J. Murphy (Ed.), Social Media, Sociality, and Survey Research (pp. 1-33). John Wiley & Sons.

Murthy, D. (2012). Towards a Sociological Understanding of Social Media: Theorizing Twitter. Sociology, 46(6), 1059-1073.

Myers, S. A.; Sharma, A.; Gupta, P. & Lin, J. (2014). Information network or social network? the structure of the twitter follow graph. In WWW '14 Companion: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 493–498).

Naaman, M.; Boase, J. & Lai, C.-H. (2010). Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. In CSCW '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 189–192).

Narr, S.; Luca, E. W. D. & Albayrak, S. (2011). Extracting semantic annotations from twitter. In ESAIR '11: Proceedings of the fourth workshop on Exploiting semantic annotations in information retrieval (pp. 15–16).

Nisbet, M. C. & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767-1778.

PearAnalytics (2009). Twitter study.

Pearce, W.; Holmberg, K.; Hellsten, I. & Nerlich, B. (2014). Climate Change on Twitter: Topics, Communities and Conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 Report. PLoS One, 9(4), e94785.

Percastre-Mendizábal, S.; Pont-Sorribes, C. & Codina, L. (2017). A sample design proposal for the analysis of Twitter in political communication. El profesional de la información (EPI), 26(4), 579-588.

Pérez-Rodríguez, A. V.; González-Pedraz, C. & Alonso-Berrocal, J. L. (2018). Twitter como herramienta de comunicación científica en España. Principales agentes y redes de comunicación. Communication Papers, 7(13), 95-112.

Peters, H. P.; Dunwoody, S.; Allgaier, J.; Lo, Y.-Y. & Brossard, D. (2014). Public communication of science 2.0. EMBO reports, 15(7), 749-753.

Pont Sorribes, C.; Cortiñas Rovira, S. & Di Bonito, I. (2013). Challenges and opportunities for science journalists in adopting new technologies: the case of Spain. Journal of Science Communication, 12(3).

Priem, J.; Groth, P. & Taraborelli, D. (2012). The Altmetrics Collection. PLoS One, 7(11), e48753.

Quercia, D.; Ellis, J.; Capra, L. & Crowcroft, J. (2011). In the Mood for Being Influential on Twitter. IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (pp. 307-314). Boston, MA.

Quiñónez Gómez, H. A. y Sánchez Colmenares, M. F. (2017). Uso de twitter en el Periodismo científico. Caso: El Nacional y El Universal en Venezuela (septiembre-octubre de 2014). Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 23(1), 553-568.

Ribas, C. (2012). La divulgación y la comunicación de la ciencia, en la encrucijada. Sociedad Española de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, 173, 10-12.

Robinson-Garcia, N.; Costas, R.; Isett, K.; Melkers, J. & Hicks, D. (2017). The unbearable emptiness of tweeting—About journal articles. PLoS One, 12(8), e0183551.

Rosselli, R.; Martini, M. & Bragazzi, N. L. (2016). The old and the new: vaccine hesitancy in the era of the Web 2.0. Challenges and opportunities. Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 57(1), E47-E50.

Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Russell, B.; Canty, N. & Watkinson, A. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24(3), 183-195.

Runge, K. K.; Yeo, S. K.; Cacciatore, M.; Scheufele, D. A.; Brossard, D.; Xenos, M.; Anderson, A.; Choi, D.; Kim, J.; Li, N.; Liang, X.; Stubbings, M. & Su, L. Y.-F. (2013). Tweeting nano: how public discourses about nanotechnology develop in social media environments. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 15(1).

Sasahara, K.; Hirata, Y.; Toyoda, M.; Kitsuregawa, M.; & Aihara, K. (2013). Quantifying Collective Attention from Tweet Stream. PLoS One, 8(4), e61823.

Schäfer, M. S. (2012). Online communication on climate change and climate politics: a literature review. WIREs Climate Change, 3(6), 527-543.

Schmidt, J.-H. (2014). Twitter and the rise of personal publics. In K. Weller; A. Bruns; J. Burgess; M. Mahrt & C. Puschmann (Eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 3-14). New York, USA.

Shema, H.; Bar-Ilan, J. & Thelwall, M. (2012). Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information. PLoS One, 7(5), e35869.

Small, T. A. (2011). What the hashtag? Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 872-895.

Sugimoto, C. R.; Work, S.; Larivière, V. & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037-2062.

Thelwall, M.; Haustein, S.; Larivière, V. & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services. PLoS One, 8(5), e64841.

Torres-Salinas, D.; Cabezas-Clavijo, Á. y Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2013). Altmetrics: nuevos indicadores para la comunicación científica en la Web 2.0. Comunicar, 21(41), 53-60.

Uddin, M.; Imran, M. & Sajjad, H. (2014). Understanding Types of Users on Twitter. In SocialCom-Stanford, California, USA.

Uren, V. & Dadzie, A.-S. (2015). Public science communication on Twitter: a visual analytic approach. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(3), 337-355.

Van Dijck, J. (2011). Tracing Twitter: The rise of a microblogging platform. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 7(3), 333-348.

Van Liere, D. (2010). How far does a tweet travel? Information brokers in the twitterverse. In MSM '10: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Modeling Social Media (pp. 1–4).

Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature news, 512(7513), 126-129.

Veltri, G. (2013). Microblogging and nanotweets: Nanotechnology on Twitter. Public Understanding of Science, 22(7), 832-849.

Veltri, G. & Atanasova, D. (2015). Climate change on Twitter: Content, media ecology and information sharing behaviour. Public Understanding of Science, 26(6), 721-737.

Walter, S.; Lörcher, I. & Brüggemann, M. (2019). Scientific networks on Twitter: Analyzing scientists’ interactions in the climate change debate. Public Understanding of Science, 28(6), 696-712.

Wasike, B. (2019). Citations Gone #Social: Examining the Effect of Altmetrics on Citations and Readership in Communication Research. Social Science Computer Review.

Waters, R. D. & Jamal, J. Y. (2011). Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ Twitter updates. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 321-324.

Weller, K.; Bruns, A.; Burgess, J.; Mahrt, M. & Puschmann, C. (2013). Twitter and Society. Peter Lang.

Westerman, D.; Spence, P. R. & Van Der Heide, B. (2012). A social network as information: The effect of system generated reports of connectedness on credibility on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 199-206.

Wilkinson, D. & Thelwall, M. (2012). Trending Twitter topics in English: An international comparison. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1631-1646.

Zhao, W. X.; Jiang, J.; Weng, J.; He, J.; Lim, E.-P.; Yan, H. & Li, X. (2011). Comparing Twitter and Traditional Media Using Topic Models. In P. Clough; C. Foley; C. Gurrin; G. J. F. Jones; W. Kraaij; H. Lee & V. Mudoch (Eds.), Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 338-349). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.


Estadísticas en RUA



Cómo citar

Denia, E. (2021). Twitter como objeto de investigación en comunicación de la ciencia. Revista Mediterránea De Comunicación, 12(1), 289–301.